bracket
what should be said.

A curated collection of wild, outrageous, and hilarious profanity definitions and pronunciations for your churning, educational learning, and entertainment.

Results for "2 Kings 4:35"

2 kings 4:35

Definition: Then he returned, and walked in the house to and fro; and went up, and stretched himself upon him: and the child sneezed seven times, and the child opened his eyes.


Explanation: Okay, let's break down this Bible verse. It’s a really strange and vivid description of a scene! Here’s what it means in simple terms: Basically, it describes a very dramatic and unsettling moment. Here’s a breakdown of what’s happening: “Then he returned, and walked in the house to and fro…” – This suggests someone was visiting or staying at a place. The person is moving around inside. “…and went up, and stretched himself upon him…” – They were raising themselves up on this child. It’s like they were putting pressure or focusing their attention on the child. “And the child sneezed seven times…” – This is the key part! The child was sneezing repeatedly. “…and the child opened his eyes.” – Suddenly, the child's eyes opened. Putting it all together, here’s what we can infer: The verse describes a situation where someone was intensely focused on and possibly controlling this child. The repeated sneezing could be interpreted as a sign of distress, fear, or perhaps even being manipulated by the person in charge. Possible Interpretations (these are just theories – it's important to remember this is an ancient text with symbolic meaning): A Test or Punishment: It’s often understood as a test or punishment, possibly related to the child’s behavior or the person's actions. Divine Intervention: It could represent a moment of divine intervention, perhaps a consequence for wrongdoing or a shift in fate. A Symbolic Representation: The sneezing and opening eyes might symbolize a breaking point or an intense emotional experience. Important Note: This is a very old text, written long ago. It's important to remember that the meaning isn’t always straightforward and it has been interpreted in various ways over time. --- Do you want me to explain any of these aspects further? For example, would you like me to delve deeper into: The historical context of this passage? Different possible interpretations of its symbolism?